It’s 2025. Does What You Wear to Court Still Matter
Courtrooms have changed significantly over the years, reflecting broader shifts in societal norms and expectations. You’re likely to see a wider variety of attire in court than ever before. People may be coming from or going to work, and we’ve come to realize that access to certain clothing shouldn’t impact your access to justice. Yet, despite these changes, what you wear to court still matters—to the judge, your attorney, and, if applicable, the jury. While the justice system strives to be fair and impartial, first impressions and unconscious biases can still influence outcomes.
In other words, remember that people are still people.
Here are a few things to keep in mind about what’s still going on in the courtroom in 2025.
1. Impressions and Professionalism
The way you dress sends a message. Whether you’re a plaintiff, defendant, witness, or even a spectator, your attire communicates something.
Judges, attorneys, and jurors are human, and humans make judgments based on appearance—often within seconds. While judges aim to provide a fair and just environment regardless of what someone wears, the reality is that your attire can distract from the facts of your case.
2. Bias and Perception
Even though the justice system aspires to be impartial, unconscious biases can creep into decisions. For example:
Judges: While most judges prioritize fairness, they may form opinions about your credibility or seriousness based on how you present yourself.
Attorneys: Your attorney may find it harder to advocate for you effectively if your appearance detracts from your case. They’ll want you to present yourself in a way that reinforces your position and builds trust with the court.
Juries: If your case involves a jury, their perception of you can be even more critical. Jurors may unconsciously interpret sloppy or overly casual attire as disrespectful or untrustworthy, even if that’s far from the truth.
3. Cultural and Generational Shifts
It’s 2025, societal norms around clothing have relaxed. People have become more accepting of diverse styles and personal expression. However, the courtroom remains a formal setting where traditional standards still hold weight. Signs on courtroom doors may mention that flip flops and spaghetti strap tops are not allowed. Some courts might not allow shorts, while others don’t make any mention of clothing at all.
Then there’s the security issue. Belts are to buckled. Shirts are to be tucked inside of pants, and hands may not be in your pockets. The courtroom, like any other place, has seen its share of violence, even with deputies present, and sometimes this has resulted in rules regarding attire and how you present yourself in court.
Conclusion
Yes, clothing styles have evolved—even in the courtroom. Judges work hard to be inclusive and impartial, treating everyone with respect. Most believe that your attire shouldn’t determine your access to justice. In fact, many courts provide suit coats or other clothing for those in need.
However, first impressions still matter—people are human, after all. While it’s important to stay authentic, how you present yourself in court can influence the perception of your case.
By paying attention to your attire, you take a simple yet meaningful step to ensure that your appearance supports, rather than detracts from, the strength of your arguments in the courtroom.